Pepperwood Preserve Sediment Reduction Implementation Project

Summary

SCH Number
2013099001
Lead Agency
City of Santa Rosa
Document Title
Pepperwood Preserve Sediment Reduction Implementation Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/3/2013
Document Description
The project is limited to the treatment of 26 stream crossings, as part of a larger sediment reduction project on the Pepperwood Preserve, in the Mark West Creek watershed. Project elements include: the installation of critical dips at certain stream crossings to prevent stream diversions, the cleaning of culvert inlets and outlets to improve water and debris capacity, the installation of a new culverts at previous unculverted fill sites to reduce the likelihood of a mass fill failure, replacement of undersized or damaged culverts, decommission of stream crossings no longer needed, rock armoring or fill slopes to prevent erosion, and armoring wet crossings to reduce sediment and improve durability. The project also includes a number of activities outside stream areas, including installation of rolling dips, road out sloping, and new ditch relief culverts, that will help decrease the hydraulic connectivity of the road system and reduce sediment inputs into Mark West Creek.

Contact Information

Name
Adam McKannay
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Santa Rosa
Counties
Sonoma

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print