Laguna Niguel to San Juan Capistrano Passing Siding Project
5 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2013091008
- Lead Agency
- Orange County Transportation Authority
- Document Title
- Laguna Niguel to San Juan Capistrano Passing Siding Project
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Document Description
- The Orange County Transportation Authority, in cooperation with Metrolink (operated by the Southern California Regional Rail Authority), the City of Laguna Niguel, and the city of San Juan Capistrano, proposes the addition of approximately 1.8 miles of new passing siding railroad track adjacent to the existing main track between milepost 183.9 and milepost 195.7. The purpose of the project is to facilitate a faster, safer, and more reliable passenger rail system. The project supports the goals of the Metrolink Service Expansion Program.
- Contact Information
-
Jason Lee
Orange County Transportation Authority
550 South Main Street
Orange, CA 92863-1584
714 560 5833
Location
- Coordinates
- 33°32'52.27"N 117°37'36.10"W
- Cities
- San Juan Capistrano Laguna Niguel
- Counties
- Orange
- Cross Streets
- Camino Capistrano and SR 73
- Zip
- 92675
- Total Acres
- 3.2
- State Highways
- I-5
- Railways
- Metrolink Lossan Corridor
- Schools
- Capistrano Valley HS
- Waterways
- Oso Creek and Trabuco Creek
- Township
- 7S
- Range
- 8W
- Section
- 25
- Base
- SBB&M
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA)
- Approving Agency Role
- Lead Agency
- Approved On
- Final EIR Available Location
- Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) 550 South Main Street, Orange CA 92863-1584
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No