Harbor Blvd. Mixed Use Transit Corridor Plan (GPA 2014-02, ZOA 2014-01, AA 2014-01)

7 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2013061027
Lead Agency
City of Santa Ana
Document Title
Harbor Blvd. Mixed Use Transit Corridor Plan (GPA 2014-02, ZOA 2014-01, AA 2014-01)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/20/2014
Present Land Use
Commercial and residential/Specific Plan (North Harbor Specific Plan)/LR-7, LMR-11, MR-15, GC, IND, and O
Document Description
Second reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2014-01 & Amendment Application No. 2014-01 for the Harbor Boulevard Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan. The SP adopted 10/21/14 replaces the North Harbor Specific Plan (NHSP) to two areas: 1) Harbor Corridor Plan (HCP): 305-ac within the NHSP generally along Harbor Blvd, and 2) Conventional Zoning Area (CZA): 120-ac within the NHSP in the Willowick Golf Course area. The HCP regulates 252-ac in four districts: Transit Node, Corridor, Neighborhood Transitional , Open Space. Buildout of the HCP could generate 3,884 additional dwelling units and 13,721 additional sf commercial. No changes are proposed in the CZA.

Contact Information

Name
Karen Haluza
Agency Name
City of Santa Ana
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Santa Ana
Counties
Orange
Cross Streets
Harbor Boulevard/Westminster Ave. and Harbor Blvd/Gloxinia Ave
Zip
92701
Total Acres
425
Parcel #
several
State Highways
SR-22
Waterways
Santa Ana River

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
City of Santa Ana
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print