Big Dry Creek Seepage Remediation
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2013061024
Lead Agency
Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District
Document Title
Big Dry Creek Seepage Remediation
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/31/2013
Present Land Use
Fresno County AE - 20; City of Clovis, Open Space
Document Description
Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District proposes to modify the existing toe drain of Big Dry Creek Dam constructed in 1993. The proposed enhanced toe drain will be located approximately 3 feet away from the downstream base of the dam. The enhanced toe drain will run along the downstream toe of the dam for an approximate length of 7,000 feet and will measure 15 feet deep by 1.5 feet wide. Perforated pipe will be placed into the drain and a small dewatering pump will be installed near the outlet channel. The perforated pipe will be installed by jack and bore under the outlet channel, and a utility trench for electrical conduit will be cut from a power source located about 50 feet away to the pump station.
Contact Information
Name
Kristine Johnson
Agency Name
Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Clovis
Counties
Fresno
Cross Streets
Shepherd Avenue and Temperance Avenue
Zip
93611
State Highways
SR 168
Airports
Fresno Yosemite Int'l
Schools
Bud Rank ES
Waterways
San Joaquin River
Township
12S
Range
21E
Section
15/22
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.