Proposed Costco Wholesale Warehouse and Fueling Facility

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2013032047
Lead Agency
San Jose, City of (City of San Jose)
Document Title
Proposed Costco Wholesale Warehouse and Fueling Facility
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The project consists of approval by the DTSC of a Response Plan for the Proposed Costco Wholesale Warehouse and Fueling Facility site (Site). DTSC's approval action is being undertaken pursuant to the regulatory authority granted under Chapter 6.8, Division 20 of the Health and Safety Code. The purpose of the Response Plan, which constitutes the project subject to approval by the DTSC, is to mitigate potential risk of human health and the environment by the contaminant of concern, arsenic, at the project site, which was formerly used for agriculture. Anticipated future land use for the Site is the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft. retail building (Costco) with a 4,032-sq. ft. fueling canopy with 20 fueling pumps. Response activities to be conducted pursuant to the Response Plan include the following: Excavate an estimated 11,070 cubic yards of arsenic-impacted soil from locations previously identified during Site investigations; Consolidate the excavated impacted soil beneath the footprint of the planned Costco Warehouse building.

Contact Information
Nicole Yuen
DTSC
700 Heinz Avenue
Berkeley, CA 94710

510-540-3881

Location

Coordinates
37°14'35"N 121°47'10"W
Cities
San Jose
Counties
Santa Clara
Cross Streets
Great Oaks Pkwy & Little Avenue, Hwy 85
Zip
95119
Total Acres
76
Parcel #
706-08-008, -010, -011, -015
State Highways
Hwy 85
Railways
UPRR
Schools
Santa Teresa ES
Waterways
Coyote Creek

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
DTSC
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=60002294

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search