Phase 1 of the I-80/SR65 Interchange Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2016-0291-R2)
8 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2013012003
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 3
Document Title
Phase 1 of the I-80/SR65 Interchange Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2016-0291-R2)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/3/2017
Present Land Use
Commercial, Residential, Open Space, Professional Office, Industrial, Recreation/Conservation, Public/Quasi Public, Flood Plain
Document Description
CDFW has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2016-0291-R2, pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, Caltrans, as represented by Wayne Lewis.
Project proposes to construct Phase 1 of the I-80/SR 65 interchange improvements (Caltrans EA 03-0H266U). The project is limited to improvements to the I-80/65 interchange and the Galleria Blvd/Stanford Ranch Road/SR 65 Northbound ramps in Placer County, CA to reduce future traffic congestion, improve operations and safety, and comply with current Caltrans and local agency design standards.
Project will widen northbound SR 65 from the East Roseville Viaduct that crosses Antelope Creek to Pleasant Grove Blvd off-ramp, and widen and modify ramps at the Galleria Blvd/Stanford Ranch Rd/SR 65 interchange.
Contact Information
Name
Angela Calderaro
Agency Name
CDFW
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Rocklin, Roseville
Counties
Placer
Cross Streets
SR 65 and I-80
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
SR 65, I-80
Railways
UPRR
Schools
Antelope Creek, John Adams...
Waterways
Secret Ravine, Antelope Crk, Dry Crk, Miner's Ravine
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.