Parkside Residential Development [California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2007-032-04 (ITP) Minor Amendment No. 2]

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2012121037
Lead Agency
Taft, City of (City of Taft)
Document Title
Parkside Residential Development [California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2007-032-04 (ITP) Minor Amendment No. 2]
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
This proposed project involves the construction of a residential housing with up to 350 single family dwellings on portions of a 126.89 acre parcel on the western edge of the City of Taft. Project will permanently remove 90.33 acres of San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica) and San Joaquin antelope squirrel (Ammospermophilus nelsoni) habitat. The project is expected to result in incidental take of San Joaquin kit fox and San Joaquin antelope squirrel, designated as threatened species under CESA. The ITP Minor Amendment No. 2 referenced above as issued by CDFW updates the Contact Person and contact information, includes the option to use a qualified biological monitor, and modifies the fencing used for exclusion and changes barbed wire fencing to slick wire fencing.

Contact Information
Benessa ESpino
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Central Region 1234 East Shaw Avenue
Fresno, CA 93710

559-243-4014 x244

Location

Cities
Taft
Counties
Kern
Cross Streets
Hillard Street and SR 33
Zip
93268
Total Acres
127
Parcel #
032-152-04 & 032-152-34
State Highways
SR 33
Railways
No
Airports
Taft Municipal
Schools
No
Waterways
Sandy Creek
Township
32S
Range
23E
Section
14
Base
MDB&M

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
1234 E. Shaw Ave., Fresno, CA 93710

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Download CSV New Search