San Joaquin River Restoration Program - SCARF and Related Management Actions Project
23 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2012111083
Lead Agency
Fish & Game #4
Document Title
San Joaquin River Restoration Program - SCARF and Related Management Actions Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/4/2014
Present Land Use
Recreational District: Fish Hatchery
Document Description
The primary purpose of the Salmon Conservation and Research Facility (SCARF) is to produce Chinook salmon for reintroduction to the San Joaquin River. The SCARF also would serve as a research facility for studies related to Chinook salmon in the San Joaquin River Restoration Program Restoration Area. The SCARF would provide CDFW with the ability to use relatively small numbers of Chinook salmon eggs and juveniles collected from various donor populations to develop a broodstock. This broodstock would enable CDFW to produce a conservation stock that is genetically diverse, while minimizing impacts to source populations. The SCARF would include structures, a parking area, water supply and wastewater systems, drainage and stormwater management, an access road, up to two staff residences, and other ancillary improvements.
Contact Information
Name
Gerald Hatler
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Fresno, Madera, Merced, Stanislaus
Regions
Northern California, San Francisco Bay Area, Southern California
Cross Streets
17372 Brook Trout Drive near North Friant Road
Zip
93626
Other Location Info
Various
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.