Beaumont Avenue Recharge Facility and Pipeline
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2012111033
Lead Agency
San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency
Document Title
Beaumont Avenue Recharge Facility and Pipeline
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/22/2013
Present Land Use
City of Beaumont:
Recharge Facility Site - Specific Plan Area (Zoning), Single Family Residential (GP)
County of Riverside:
Pipeline - Streets
Service Connection Site - Residential Agricultural (Zoning), Rural Community - Very Low Density Residential (General Plan)
Document Description
The proposed project includes the construction and operation of a recharge facility, pipeline, and service connection facility. The recharge facility consists of a series of five tiered basins, each separated by berms. The facility would have raised embankments along its perimeter so that a portion of the basins will be above the current ground elevation and a portion of the basins will be below the current ground elevation.
Contact Information
Name
Jeff Davis
Agency Name
San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Beaumont
Counties
Riverside
Cross Streets
Generally Beaumont Avenue and Brookside Avenue
Zip
92223
Total Acres
50.9
Parcel #
406-080-032
State Highways
SR 60, SR 79, I-10
Railways
Union Pacific
Schools
BUSD, K-12
Waterways
Noble Creek, Little San Gorgonio Creek
Township
2S
Range
1W
Section
34
Base
SBB&M
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.