Saddle Ridge Estates (Aka Cascade Crossing)
Summary
SCH Number
2012099013
Lead Agency
California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Region 2
(CDFW)
Document Title
Saddle Ridge Estates (Aka Cascade Crossing)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/24/2012
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Game is executing Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2012-0157-R2, pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code the project applicant, HBT of Saddle Ridge, LLC as represented by Jeff Pemstein.
The project is limited to: 1) Cleaning and preparing seven existing 36" CMP structures for installation of concrete in approximately 70' x 50' area within Ragsdale Creek. Preparation shall include installing native rock riprap on culvert inlets and outlets; Concrete shall be pumped from outside the riparian corridor. Road fill and asphalt shall be added on top of the concrete; 2) Installation of approximately 750 square feet (56 cubic yards) of riprap downstream of the bridge/culvert crossing, 3) Installation of approximately 1,275 square feet of turf mats adjacent to the riprap, downstream of the bridge/culverts; 4) Installation of drainage pipes connecting tow onsite detention basins to the creek; 5) Installation of a collar on the drainage outfall upstream of the bridge/culvert crossing. A backhoe concrete pump shall be used to conduct the work.
Contact Information
Name
Julie Newman
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Region 2
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Nevada
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.