FRE-168 Prather Curve Correction EA 06-0M050; Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2014-0074-R4.

5 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2012091039
Lead Agency
Caltrans 6 (Fresno) (California Department of Transportation, District 6)
Document Title
FRE-168 Prather Curve Correction EA 06-0M050; Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2014-0074-R4.
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/22/2014
Present Land Use
The zoning in project are is designated agriculture and grazing to the north and rural residential to the south.

Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife is executing a Streambed Alteration Agreement pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the Project applicant, Caltrans. The Project involves realignment of the existing curve on SR 168. As part of this project, 491 feet of currently open bed, bank, and channel of the tributary to Little Dry Creek running parallel to the south side of SR 168 will be culverted for permanent sight distance safety improvement. Three existing culverts running under SR 168 will be replaced and lengthened to the north. At the final location, the current culvert under SR 168 will remain in place and will be extended to the north.

Contact Information
Laura Peterson-Diaz
CDFW Central Region
1234 East Shaw Avenue
Fresno, CA 93710

Phone : 559-243-4017, ext. 225

Location

Coordinates
37°1''683"N 119°31''361"W
Counties
Fresno
Cross Streets
Chinquapin Lane and Mountain Canyon Rd (SR 168)
Zip
93651
Parcel #
Multiple
State Highways
Hwy 168
Railways
n/a
Airports
n/a
Schools
Foothill Middle School
Waterways
Ephemeral Stream
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Prather

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final Environmental Document Available at
Caltrans Central Region Environmental Office, 855 M Street, Suite 200, Fresno, CA 93721

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A
Download CSV New Search