Phase 2 Meridian Farms Fish Screen Project

8 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2012082032
Lead Agency
Fish & Game #2
Document Title
Phase 2 Meridian Farms Fish Screen Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/11/2012
Document Description
MFWC is proposing to remove the existing Meridian Diversion/Pumping Plant along the Sacramento River in the vicinity of the Town of Meridian, Sutter County CA and replace it with a new diversion/pumping plant equipped with retractable cylindrical fish screens to preventing entrainment of migrating, at-risk, native fish species. The project would also include improvement of the Main Canal to increase flow capacity to the Drexler Service area, extension of the Drexler Pipeline, and construction of a new Drexler re-lift pump station on the Main Canal east of the Sacramento River. The existing Drexler Diversion/Pumping Plant located south of the Meridian Diversion on the Sacramento River would be removed. The Proposed Project/Action would not increase MFWC's overall diversion capacity from the Sacramento River. All work would be performed in compliance with Reclamation Board, CDFG, NMFS, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service requirements.

Contact Information

Name
Tracy McReynolds
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Counties
Sutter
Cross Streets
Multiple
Zip
95957
Parcel #
Multiple
State Highways
Hwy 20
Schools
Meridian ES
Waterways
Sacramento River
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Meridian

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print