State Route 65 Dry Creek Bridge Scour Repair Project (1600-2013-0217-R2)
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2012072054
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 3
Document Title
State Route 65 Dry Creek Bridge Scour Repair Project (1600-2013-0217-R2)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/24/2014
Present Land Use
Agricultural and Rural
Document Description
The CA Dept. of Fish and Wildlife is executing Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2013-0217-R2, pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, CA Dept. of Transportation (Caltrans).
This project proposes to perform scour mitigation on Dry Creek Bridge on SR 65 in Yuba County near the City of Wheatland at PM 2.21 by placing RSP along the full length and width of the structure. The project will involve bridge work, grinding of the existing deck surface and/or structure, construction of access roads, an equipment staging area, work within the 100 year floodplain, railroad involvement, temporary construction easements, ground disturbance, vegetation removal, seasonal construction windows, night work, work within the stream channel and placement of RSP.
Contact Information
Name
Tim Nosal
Agency Name
CA Dept. of Fish and Wildlife
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Wheatland
Counties
Yuba
Cross Streets
SR 65 & Dry Creek Levee Road
Zip
95692
Total Acres
.5
Parcel #
right-of-way
State Highways
SR 65
Railways
SPRR
Airports
No
Schools
No
Waterways
Dry Creek & Bear Creek
Township
14N
Range
5E
Section
30
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.