State Coastal Conservancy - Water for Wildlife Project NOD
27 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2012072030
Lead Agency
Alameda County Resource Conservation District
(ACRCD)
Document Title
State Coastal Conservancy - Water for Wildlife Project NOD
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/11/2020
Present Land Use
Leased cattle ranching / grazing
Document Description
The Water for Wildlife, East Bay Rangeland Pond and Trough Enhancement Project (project). The project consists of the implementation of Best Management Practices for livestock watering facilities, which will support and enhance riparian ecosystems, improve habitat for listed species (with a focus on listed amphibians), and continue to support viable grazing on certain properties in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. Through partnerships with local land managers, grazing lessees, and the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)’s Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), this project will restore six ponds and develop six livestock water systems across Alameda and Contra Costa counties.
Contact Information
Name
Avra Heller
Agency Name
California State Coastal Conservancy
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Email
Name
Agency Name
Alameda County Resource Conservation District
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Coordinates
Counties
Alameda
Regions
San Francisco Bay Area
Other Location Info
Sunol Ridge Trail (center of site), Pleasanton Ridge Regional Park
Other Information
Projects will occur at various other locations as well.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California State Coastal Conservancy
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes