I-10/Cedar Avenue Interchange Improvements Project
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2012071091
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 8
Document Title
I-10/Cedar Avenue Interchange Improvements Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/12/2013
Present Land Use
Single Residential/General Commercial/Regional Industrial/Community Industrial/Institutional
Document Description
The County of San Bernardino (County), in cooperation with the Caltrans proposes capacity and operational improvements to the I-10/Cedar Avenue interchange. The project is located within the community of Bloomington in unincorporated San Bernardino County. The proposed project would widen the existing Cedar Avenue overcrossing, the UPRR overhead, and Cedar Avenue from four to six lanes; and realign and widen the I-10 on- and off-ramps to connect to the improved Cedar Avenue and to improve turning and storage capacity.
Contact Information
Name
Kurt Heidelberg
Agency Name
California Department of Transportation, District 8
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Counties
San Bernardino
Cross Streets
I-10/Cedar Avenue
Zip
92316
Total Acres
91.07
State Highways
I-10
Railways
UPRR
Schools
Bloomgington MS
Waterways
I-10 Channel
Township
1S
Range
5W
Section
21,22
Base
SBB&M
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Bloomington
Other Information
Cont. Section: 27
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Caltrans
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.