Peter Michael Tributary 3 Bypass Facility

3 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2012062066
Lead Agency
State Water Resources Control Board
Document Title
Peter Michael Tributary 3 Bypass Facility
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
To protect fish and wildlife, Pete Michael Winery (Applicant) will construct the Tributary 3 Bypass Project (Project) in Tributary 3, roughly 40 feet upstream of the confluence with the lower reservoir. During the period from December 15 through March 31, the Applicant shall bypass a minimum of 0.56 cfs rom Tributary 3 or the total streamflow if flow is less than 0.56 cfs. From April 1 through December 14, the Applicant shall bypass the total streamflow. The bypasses streamflow will flow through a 12-inch diameter pipeline (bypass pipeline) buried along the eastern side of the lower reservoir under the existing gravel path. The bypass flow will be released into Tributary 5 connecting the bypass pipeline to an existing 12-inch diameter storm drain pipeline that originates near the toe of the lower reservoir dam and empties into Tributary 5, and subsequently Kellogg Creek.

Contact Information
Amber Villalobos
State Water Resources Control Board, Div. of Water Rights
1001 I Street, 14th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814

916 323 9389

Location

Cities
Calistoga
Counties
Sonoma
Cross Streets
Ida Clayton Road
Zip
94515
Total Acres
151
Parcel #
120-040-015/016, 120-050-012
Waterways
Maacama Creek
Township
9N
Range
7W
Section
8/5
Base
MDB&M

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Rights, 1001 I Street 14th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
N/A
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A
Download CSV New Search