Site-Specific Weed and Pest Management Project

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2012042009
Lead Agency
Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District
Document Title
Site-Specific Weed and Pest Management Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District proposes to implement a site-specific weed and pest management project on select sites on open space preserves in Santa Clara and San Mateo counties, CA. Weed and pest management activities would occur at 42 distinct treatment sites within 13 of its 26 designated open space preserve (OSP) areas in the years 2012 through 2014. The purpose of the project is to control noxious and invasive weed and pest species in high priority natural areas of the District to halt or minimize the spread of those species in areas where substantial progress has been made towards eradication or site restoration to more natural conditions. The District would carry out an IPM approach in the implementation of this project.

Contact Information
Cindy Roessler
Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District
330 Distel Circle
Los Altos, CA 94022

(650) 691-1200

Location

Coordinates
37°16'36.87"N 122°7'42.98"W
Cities
Woodside Saratoga Los Gatos Cupertino
Counties
Santa Clara San Mateo
Cross Streets
SR 17/Bear Crk Rd; Skyline Blvd/Page Mill Rd, SR 9, 84, Kings Mtn Rd; SR 280/Edge
Zip
94062
Total Acres
1029
Parcel #
various
State Highways
SR 35, 17, 9
Railways
No
Airports
No
Schools
various
Waterways
Lexington Reservoir, Horseshoe Lake, numerous creeks
Township
variou
Range
variou
Section
Variou
Base
MDB&M

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District administrative offices, 330 Distel Circle, Los Altos, CA 94022

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search