Redlands Passenger Rail Project (RPRP)
16 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2012041012
Lead Agency
San Bernardino Associated Governments
Document Title
Redlands Passenger Rail Project (RPRP)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/10/2018
Present Land Use
Various
Document Description
RPRP is an approx. nine mile corridor extending east from the City of San Bernardino to the City of Redlands and includes local and express train service. SBCTA certified a FEIR for the project in March of 2015. Following additional engineering during final design, SBCTA is proposing minor refinements to the project at Bridge 9.4 and University Street. These refinements include a revised design for Bridge 9.4, relocation of a drainage connection previously proposed at the Mill Creek Zanja, a new detention basin (east of I-10 and south of the railroad right-of-way), and expanded roadway improvements north of the at-grade crossing at University Street (and Park Ave).
Contact Information
Name
Andres Ramirez
Agency Name
San Bernardino County Transportation Authority
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Redlands, San Bernardino
Counties
San Bernardino
Cross Streets
Various
Zip
92408
Total Acres
134
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
I-215, 10
Railways
BNSF/Metrolink
Airports
San Bernardino International
Schools
Various
Waterways
Various including Santa Ana River
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
San Bernardino County Transportation Authority
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.