Redlands Passenger Rail Project (RPRP) - Addendum No. 1 to the EIR
16 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2012041012
Lead Agency
San Bernardino Associated Governments
Document Title
Redlands Passenger Rail Project (RPRP) - Addendum No. 1 to the EIR
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/15/2017
Present Land Use
Various
Document Description
Project is an approx. nine mile corridor extending east from the City of San Bernardino to the City of Redlands and includes local and express train service. SBCTA certified a FEIR for the project in March of 2015. The FEIR considered six potential station stops; five of which were carried forward for final design. Based on revised ridership forecasts, SBCTA is proposing to relocate a station stop approved at Waterman Ave. to Tippecanoe Ave. A Station stop at Tippecanoe Ave. was considered as part of the Preferred Alternative in the FEIR; whereas the Waterman Ave. station stop was considered as part of Design Option 3.
Contact Information
Name
Justin Fornelli
Agency Name
San Bernardino County Transportation Authority
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Redlands, San Bernardino
Counties
San Bernardino
Cross Streets
Various
Zip
92408
Total Acres
134
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
I-215, 10
Railways
BNSF/Metrolink
Airports
San Bernardino International
Schools
Various
Waterways
Various including Santa Ana River
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
San Bernardino County Transportation Authority
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.