Redlands Passenger Rail Project
16 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2012041012
Lead Agency
San Bernardino Associated Governments
Document Title
Redlands Passenger Rail Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/10/2015
Present Land Use
Various
Document Description
The project would include the development of new railroad infrastructure along an approximate nine-mile section of rail corridor owned by SANBAG and commonly referred to as the Redlands Subdivision. The project would include the development of four new stations consisting of boarding platforms with supporting amenities and parking and a new train layover/storage facility. Track upgrades would include signal improvements, culverts and utility replacements and relocations, replacement or retrofit of six existing bridge structures, and improvements to 30 grade crossings. Local transit service would occur from five stations located at E Street and Tippercanoe Avenue (or Waterman Avenue) in the City of San Bernardino and New York Street, Orange Street (Downtown Redlands), and University Street (University of Redlands) in the City of Redlands.
Contact Information
Name
Mitchell Alderman
Agency Name
San Bernardino Associated Governments
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Redlands, San Bernardino
Counties
San Bernardino
Cross Streets
Various
Zip
92408
Total Acres
134
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
I-215, 10
Railways
BNSF/Metrolink
Airports
San Bernardino International
Schools
Various
Waterways
Various including Santa Ana River
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
SANBAG Board of Directors
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.