Heaps Peak Slope Repair Project (California Endangered Species Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2014-045-06 (ITP))
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2012031087
Lead Agency
San Bernardino County
Document Title
Heaps Peak Slope Repair Project (California Endangered Species Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2014-045-06 (ITP))
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/11/2017
Present Land Use
Lake Arrowhead Community Plan - Institutional
Document Description
This proposed project involves permanent repairs to the landfill slope involving the excavation of a "wedge" of refuse, replacing the excavated refuse to form an overall 2:1 gradient, and covering and compacting the refuse slope with one to two feet of imported soil. The Project will result in impacts to 2.32 acres of Southern rubber boa (Charina bottae umbratica) habitat including temporary impacts to 0.62 acres. The project is expected to result in incidental take of Southern rubber boa (Charina bottae umbratica), which is/are designated as a threatened species under CESA. The ITP referenced above as issued by CDFW authorizes incidental take of species listed under CESA that may occur as a result of project implementation.
Contact Information
Name
Kimberly Freburn-Marquez
Agency Name
CDFW
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Counties
San Bernardino
Cross Streets
29898 Hwy 18 (3 miles west of Running Springs)
Zip
92382
Total Acres
4
Parcel #
033-130-105 and 033-233-124
State Highways
Hwy 18
Waterways
Shake Creek, Deep Creek
Township
2N
Range
3W
Section
24/25
Base
SBB&M
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Skyforest & Running Springs
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.