Markham Ravine Ranch Habitat Development Grading Plan (DGP 4951)
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2012012044
Lead Agency
Placer County
Document Title
Markham Ravine Ranch Habitat Development Grading Plan (DGP 4951)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/16/2012
Present Land Use
agriculture / farm with a minimum lot size of 80 acres / agriculture/timberland, 80-acre minimum
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Game is executing Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2011-0167-R2, pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, Restoration Resources, 3888 Cincinnati Avenue, Rocklin, CA 95765.
The project proposes a grading permit based on a conceptual Habitat Development Plan (HDP) to optimize the conservation values of the 305-acre site located on the border of Sutter and Placer Counties. The HDP plans to construct 64.35 acres of wetlands habitats, 7.45 acres of other waters of the US, 305 acres of upland habitats, and various acreages for species habitat credits.
Contact Information
Name
Maywan Krach
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Lincoln
Counties
Placer
Cross Streets
Nicolaus and Moore Roads
Total Acres
305
Parcel #
021-030-060, 065
Airports
Lincoln
Township
12N
Range
5E
Section
18
Base
MDB&M
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
DFG
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.