Effluent Disposal Improvement Project
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2012012041
Lead Agency
Murphys Sanitary District
Document Title
Effluent Disposal Improvement Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/16/2012
Present Land Use
Agriculture
Document Description
District effluent is currently reclaimed via irrigation of the Hay Station Ranch Recycled Water Reuse Areas, which is operated by John Kautz Farms. The District's wastewater treatment facility and Hay Station Ranch Recycled Reuse Areas are regulated by Waste Discharge Orders No. 5-00-264 and No. 5-01-063, respectively. With ongoing changes in ranching practices, the District is seeking to supplement its current reclamation operation with some effluent disposal facilities to assure complete land containment of all effluent under all foreseeable climatic and ranch conditions. To meet this objective, the District is proposing to construct effluent disposal fields and ground water monitoring wells on 20 acres of District owned property. The effluent disposal project will serve to back up and offset the District's existing effluent reclamation activities at Hay Station Ranch.
Contact Information
Name
Gary Ghio
Agency Name
Murphys Sanitary District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Murphys
Counties
Calaveras
Cross Streets
735 Six Mile Road
Zip
95247
Total Acres
20
Parcel #
066-201-027
State Highways
Hwy 4
Schools
Albert Michelson ES
Township
3N
Range
14E
Section
8
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Murphys Sanitary District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
N/A
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.