State Route 58 (Rosedale Highway) Widening Project
3 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Print
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2011122028
- Lead Agency
- City of Bakersfield
- Document Title
- State Route 58 (Rosedale Highway) Widening Project
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 6/13/2012
- Present Land Use
- Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Agriculture
- Document Description
- The project proposes improvements to SR 58 (known locally as Rosedale Highway) from west of Allen Road to SR 99. The project is located within the City of Bakersfield and in portions of unincorporated Kern County. The project proposes to build two additional lanes (one in each direction) on SR 58 between Allen Road and SR 99. Other improvements include minor changes, such as restriping approach lanes to provide an additional turn lane on the side street approaches to SR 58. With the proposed improvements, SR 58 would increase from a four-lane roadway to a six-lane roadway from Allen Road to SR 99. In addition, a grade-separated rail crossing would ultimately be built where SR 58 crosses the San Joaquin Valley Railroad rail line between Mohawk Street and Landco Drive.
- Contact Information
-
Theodore D. Wright
City of Bakersfield
Lead/Public Agency
900 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 201
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Phone : (661) 326-3700
Location
- Coordinates
- 35°21'12.80"N 119°2'21.17"W
- Cities
- Bakersfield
- Counties
- Kern
- Cross Streets
- Allen Road intersection (PM 46.1) to SR 99 (PM 51.7)
- Total Acres
- 6.61
- State Highways
- Hwy 58, 99
- Railways
- BNSF and SJVR
- Schools
- Rosedale MS & Vista West Continuation HS
- Waterways
- Kern River
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- City of Bakersfield
- Approving Agency Role
- Lead Agency
- Approved On
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- Thomas Road Improvement Program Office, 900 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 200, Bakersfield, CA 93301
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- N/A
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above. You may also contact the OPR via email at state.clearinghouse@opr.ca.gov or via phone at (916) 445-0613.