Buckhorn Dam/Grass Valley Creek Toe Drain and Channel Rehabilitation

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2011112038
Lead Agency
Trinity County Resource Conservation District
Document Title
Buckhorn Dam/Grass Valley Creek Toe Drain and Channel Rehabilitation
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/2/2012
Present Land Use
Trinity County's General Plan land use designation includes open space, resource lands, and rural residential
Document Description
Approximately 4,500 cubic yards of sediment will be excavated from the outlet channel for the purpose of lowering the water surface elevation in the dam's toe drain and approximately 4,500 cubic yards of additional sediment and earthen material will be excavated to create and enhance habitat features for Coho salmon including rearing pondsand side channels. Channel creation and enhancement activities are designed to alter the existing center line alignment, create more channel sinuosity, build pool/riffle habitat, lower streambed elevations, increase channel slope, widen the cross-sectional area, and develop inset floodplain benches.

Contact Information

Name
Dean Prat
Agency Name
North Coastal Regional Water Quality
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Counties
Trinity
Cross Streets
Hwy 299
Zip
96052
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
Hwy 299
Railways
No
Airports
No
Schools
Lewiston ES
Waterways
Grass Valley Creek
Township
32N
Range
8W
Section
15,16,
Base
MDB&M
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Lewiston
Other Information
Continue Section: & 22

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print