Peninsula Pipelines Seismic Upgrade Project
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2011112028
Lead Agency
City and County of San Francisco
Document Title
Peninsula Pipelines Seismic Upgrade Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/2/2014
Present Land Use
N/A project is predominately within San Francisco Public Utilities Commission right-of-way
Document Description
The operator proposes to install a 54-inch diameter pipeline to replace the existing 54-inch diameter pipeline for a 700-foot segment. The existing pipeline will be removed using open-trench techniques to 16 foot depth bgs and 30 foot width. A temporary cofferdam will be constructed upstream and water pumped/gravity fed through the work area and back into the culvert below the project. The new pipeline will extend under and perpendicular to a box culvert conveying an unnamed tributary to Colma Creek. An 18 foot wide by 21 foot long portion of the box culvert will be replaced in-kind. The trench will be backfilled and revegetated.
The CA Dept. of Fish and Wildlife is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement Number 1600-2013-0295-R3 pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, Mr. Husam Masri, San Francisco Public Utilities Commission.
Contact Information
Name
Jeanne Wetzel
Agency Name
CA Dept. of Fish and Wildlife
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Colma, Millbrae, San Bruno, South San Francisco
Counties
San Mateo
Cross Streets
Serramonte Blvd. Westborough Blvd. Whitman Way, Ridgewood Dr
Parcel #
multiple
State Highways
I-280, 380, Hwy 101, Route 82
Railways
Caltrain, BART
Airports
SFO
Schools
Yes
Waterways
Colma Creek, Twelve Mile Creek, Green Hills Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.