CA Endangered Species Act (CESA) Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2013-027-03 (ITP)
10 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2011102051
Lead Agency
Alameda County
Document Title
CA Endangered Species Act (CESA) Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2013-027-03 (ITP)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/15/2013
Present Land Use
County General Plan: "Water Management"; County zoning: A: Agriculture, subject to County Surface Mining Ordinance
Document Description
This proposed project includes the continuation of current Alameda County Surface Mining Permit 30 (SMP 30) quarry operations as well as the 580-acre quarry expansion. The Sunol Valley Aggregates Quarry operating under SMP 30, which was approved by Alameda County in 1992, authorizes the mining of sand and gravel within a 323-acre area. Under the Revised SMP 30 permit, the Permittee proposes to expand the overall production potential of the quarry by increasing the area under the permit by ~58 acres. The expanded quarry pit will occupy ~32.5 acres and a haul road and berm will occupy 2.44 acres within the 58-acre expansion area. Within the Revised SMP 30 permit boundaries, the active quarry will occupy 310 acres.
Contact Information
Name
Marcia Grefsrud
Agency Name
CDFW
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Alameda
Cross Streets
I-680 / Calaveras Road
Total Acres
381
Parcel #
096-0080-008, 096-0375-011-05
State Highways
I-680
Waterways
Alameda Creek, San Antonio Creek
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Sunol
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.