Harris Canyon Creek Crossing Improvement

9 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2011091085
Lead Agency
Santa Barbara County
Document Title
Harris Canyon Creek Crossing Improvement
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
DFW is intending to execute a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code (# 1600-2013-0297-R5) to the project applicant, Laurie Tamura of Santa Maria Energy LLC. The project proposes to replace two existing culvert crossings on an intermittent stream to expand the roads from a single lane to 36 feet wide at the top, 50 feet wide at the base, to provide passage for two vehicles. The road elevation will be raised to accommodate a single 72-inch corrugated metal culvert to replace two small culverts at each site. A concrete trench will be installed adjacent to the road surface, on the shoulder, to be used as a protective vault for pipelines. Native rock will be used for energy dissipation and to line the slopes of the crossing. Native vegetation will be planted to replace existing ruderal non-native vegetation and native oaks will be planted within the property to mitigate for the loss of 5 oaks. The area is a working oil and gas extraction field and contains a facility and several wells.

Contact Information
Natasha Lohmus
CDFW
3883 Ruffin Road
San Diego, CA 92123

858-636-3160

Location

Cities
Santa Maria
Counties
Santa Barbara
Cross Streets
Graciosa Rd and Hwy 135
Zip
93455
Total Acres
32
Parcel #
101-020-174
State Highways
Hwy 1 and 135
Railways
No
Airports
Santa Maria
Schools
St. Joseph HS, Santa Maria Joint Union HSD, Orcutt Union SD
Waterways
Orcutt and San Antonio Creeks
Township
8N
Range
34W
Section
3
Base
SBB&M

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
3883 Ruffin Road San Diego, CA 92123

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Download CSV New Search