Village Parkway Project
18 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2011082069
Lead Agency
West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency
Document Title
Village Parkway Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/14/2014
Present Land Use
Low-, medium-, and high-density residential; agriculture; recreation; open space; river mixed use; commercial; public
Document Description
The West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (WSAFCA) is proposing the Southport Sacramento River Early Implementation Project (EIP) to implement flood risk-reduction measures along the Sacramento River South Levee in the city of West Sacramento, Yolo County, California. The study area encompasses the area of levee risk-reduction measure construction along the river corridor, roadway construction and/or relocation, and potential soil borrow sites. The project would bring the levee up to standard with Federal and state flood protection criteria, as well as providing opportunities for ecosystem restoration and public recreation.
Contact Information
Name
John Powderly
Agency Name
West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
West Sacramento
Counties
Yolo
Cross Streets
South River Road and Village Parkway
Zip
95691
Parcel #
Various
Schools
River City High School
Waterways
Sacramento River, Deep Water Ship Channel
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.