Upper Main Canal - Tunnel 2 Daylight Project; Agreement 2012-0196-R4

5 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2011082034
Lead Agency
Turlock Irrigation District
Document Title
Upper Main Canal - Tunnel 2 Daylight Project; Agreement 2012-0196-R4
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/29/2012
Present Land Use
The canal is within an existing TID easement. The adjacent agricultural lans, would be temporarily used during construction.

Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Game is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the Project applicant, Turlock Irrigation District. The application proposes to construct an approach ramp to allow access for heavy machinery into the Turlock Main Canal from a temporary haul road that will be used to transport tunnel spoils to the primary disposal area. The ramp will start from the canal bed up to hillside on the south side of the canal. Construction of the approach ramp will require the excavation of and cut into 144 square feet of an ephemeral drainage to the south of the canal.

Contact Information
Kyle Stoner
Department of Fish and Game
Region 4 1234 East Shaw
Fresno, CA 93710

Phone : 559 243 4014 ext 352

Location

Coordinates
37°37'49"N 120°29'31"W
Counties
Stanislaus
Cross Streets
Lake Road
Zip
95329
Total Acres
7.0
Parcel #
8022014000, -15000, -17000, -19000
State Highways
Hwy 132
Railways
No
Airports
No
Schools
No
Waterways
Dawson Lake, Tuolumne River, Floto Lake
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: La Grange

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
DFG
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
Turlock Irrigation District, 333 East Canal Drive, Turlock, CA 95381

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search