Digital 395 Middle Mile Project (SAA 1600-2011-0252-R6) Amendment No. 2
12 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2011081095
Lead Agency
California Public Utilities Commission
(CPUC)
Document Title
Digital 395 Middle Mile Project (SAA 1600-2011-0252-R6) Amendment No. 2
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/5/2014
Document Description
CDFW is executing an amendment (No. 2) to Streambed Alteration Agreement Issued Pursuant to Section 1602 (SAA#1600-2011-0252-R6) of the Fish and Game Code to the project Permittee, the California Broadband Cooperative. The Permittee proposes to run 10.3 miles of fiber-optic cable from the Digital 395 backbone at the Intersection of Red Hill Road and West Line Street in Bishop, CA to the Round Valley Elementary School. The project will temporarily impact 20 ephemeral and perennial CDFW jurisdictional waterways and associated riparian vegetation; however, no permanent impacts will occur and no trees shall be removed. To conduct this work, three construction methods will be implemented including cable plowing, trenching, and horizontal directional drilling (HDD). The Permittee shall use HDD to cross any other features containing water. The conditions of the Agreement shall remain in effect.
Contact Information
Name
Heidi Sickler
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Inyo, Kern, Mono, San Bernardino
Cross Streets
Regional Telecom Fiber Project in Public Rights-of-Way
State Highways
Hwy 58
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Benton, Bridgeport, Independence
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.