SDG&E South Bay Substation Relocation Project

6 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2011071031
Lead Agency
California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)
Document Title
SDG&E South Bay Substation Relocation Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/21/2013
Present Land Use
Industrical Business Park, Habitat Replacement, Park /Plaza, Open Space, Commercial Recreation
Document Description
The Proposed Project consists of the following major components: construction of a 230/69/12-kilovolt (kV) substation (Bay Boulevard Substation) in the City of Chula Vista; construction of a 230 kV loop-in, an approximately 1,000-foot-long underground interconnection and an approximately 300-foot-long overhead interconnection of the existing 230 kV tie-line, located east of the proposed Bay Bouldvard Substation; relocation of six 69 kV transmission lines; a 138 kV extension of an approximately 3,800-foot underground and approximately 200-foot overhead span from one new steel cable pole to an existing steel lattice structure; and demolition of the existing 138/69 kV South Bay Substation.

Contact Information

Name
Jensen Uchida
Agency Name
California Public Utilities Commission
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Chula Vista
Counties
San Diego
Cross Streets
Bay Boulevard, Palomar Street, L Street
Zip
91911
Total Acres
86
Parcel #
numerous
State Highways
I-5
Railways
SDA&E
Airports
No
Schools
numerous
Waterways
San Diego Bay and Telegraph Creek
Township
18S
Range
2W
Section
16&9

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Calfiornia Public Utilities Commission
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print