Sutter Basin Flood Risk Management Projecet
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2011052085
Lead Agency
Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency
(SBFCA)
Document Title
Sutter Basin Flood Risk Management Projecet
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/9/2017
Document Description
Project consists of improvements to existing levees of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project extending along approx. 41 miles of the Feather River, which will provide higher levels of flood protection to local communities. This work will be undertaken primarily by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE.) SBFCA's role in the USACE project is to (1) acquire properties for project purposes and (2) contribute funding.
The USACE explored this project in the Sutter Basin Pilot Feasibility Study (SBPFS), which resulted in a joint EIR/SEIR. The purpose of the SBPFS was to investigate and determine the extent of Federal Interest in plans that reduce flood risk to the Sutter Basin in Sutter and Butte Counties. Based upon the SBPFS and the EIR/SEIS, the USACE approved the project, which will provide higher levels of flood risk management to local communities.
Contact Information
Name
Mike Inamine
Agency Name
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Address
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Biggs, Gridley, Live Oak, Yuba City
Counties
Butte, Sutter
Cross Streets
Numerous
Zip
Numerous
Total Acres
1,000
Parcel #
Numerous
State Highways
Hwy 99
Railways
UPRR
Airports
Butte County
Schools
Numerous
Waterways
Feather River
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.