New Ukiah Courthouse

5 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2011042089
Lead Agency
Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)
Document Title
New Ukiah Courthouse
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/25/2012
Present Land Use
GPDLU: Both potential sites is C (Commercial). The Library Site has a city ZD: of C1 (Community Commercial), and the Railroad Depot Site has a ZD: of C1 (Community Commercial) and C2 (Heavy Commercial)
Document Description
Note: FINAL 1 HC The AOC proposes to construct a nine-courtroom, full-service courthouse for the Superior Court, County of Mendocino. The proposed project will be approximately 114,000 BGSF. The new courthouse will replace the court space in the existing Ukiah Courthouse, and will include court support space for court operations, court administration, criminal/civil/family law divisions, collaborative court, jury assembly and jury services, self-help, court security operations and holding and building support space. The proposed project will include surface parking spaces for staff, jurors, and the general public and secure parking spaces in the basement of the courthouse.

Contact Information

Name
Laura Sainz
Agency Name
Administrative Office of the Courts
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Ukiah
Counties
Mendocino
Cross Streets
Library Site: Perkins Street, Main Street, Mason Street/Railroad Depot site: 309 Perkins Street
Zip
95482
Total Acres
L:6;RRDS:10
State Highways
Hwy 101
Railways
Ukiah Municipal
Waterways
Gibson Creek

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Administrative Office of the Courts
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print