Final Removal Action Workplan for the Former Angews State Hospital East

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2011032006
Lead Agency
Santa Clara Unified School District
Document Title
Final Removal Action Workplan for the Former Angews State Hospital East
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
Project consist sof the approval of DTSC of a RAW for the Former Agnews State Hospital East submitted by Santa Clara Unified School District, dated Jan. 31, 2018. DTSC's response action is being undertaken pursuant to the regulatory authority granted under Chapter 6.8 Division 20 of the Health and Safety Code. The purpose of the RAW is to remediate potential risk to human health and the environment by reducing or eliminating future exposure to soils impacted by elevated concentrations of the following Contaminants of Concern (COCs): organichlorine pesticides (specifically, Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE), Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), dieldrin, heptachlor epoxide, and technical chlordane), arsenic, lead, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The project also includes mitigation of natural-occurring asbestos (NOA) by capping impacted soil. Capping will occur during construction, after building demolition and grading activities are completed by the Santa Clara Unified School District.

Contact Information
Jose Luevano
DTSC
8800 Cal Center Dr.
Sacramento, CA 95826

916-255-3577

Location

Coordinates
37°24'28"N 121°56'4"W
Cities
San Jose
Counties
Santa Clara
Cross Streets
Zanker Road and River Oaks Parkway
Zip
95134
Total Acres
59
Parcel #
097-04-040, 097-04-028
State Highways
Hwy 237, I-880
Airports
San Jose Mineta
Schools
Don Callejon, Montague
Waterways
Coyote Creek, Guadalupe River

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
DTSC
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
8800 Cal Center Dr., Sacramento, CA 95826

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search