Gleason Beach Roadway Realignment Project [California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2017-040-03 (ITP)]

8 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2011022002
Lead Agency
Caltrans 4 (Oakland) (California Department of Transportation, District 4)
Document Title
Gleason Beach Roadway Realignment Project [California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2017-040-03 (ITP)]
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The California Department of Transportation proposes to realign a section of SR 1 to an inland location. The project is limited to the replacement of the existing road alignment to a new alignment that would consist of a new 49-foot road syste, with 12-foot wide lanes with 4-foot paved and 4-foot unpaved shoulders in each direction. The project is also limited to the construction of a new 850 linear foot, clear-span bridge over Scotty Creek and its floodplain, construction of three access roads, removal of the previously existing bridge over the old Scotty Creek bridge alignment. The project will cause 0.013 acres of permanent impact and 0.14 acres of temporary impact to Covered Species habitat. The project is expected to result in incidental take of Coho Salmon Coho Salmon - south of Punta Gorda designated as an endangered species under CESA. The ITP referenced above as issued by CDFW authorizes incidental take of species listed under CESA that may occur as a result of Project implementation.

Contact Information
Robert Stanley
CDFW
2825 Cordelia Rd, Suite 100
Fairfield, CA 94534

707-428-2093

Location

Coordinates
38.385331°'"N 123.082918°'"W
Counties
Sonoma
Cross Streets
SR 1
Zip
94923
Total Acres
11.9
State Highways
SR 1
Waterways
Scotty Creek
Other Information
PM 15.1 and 15.7

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
2825 Cordelia Rd, Suite 100, Fairfield, CA 94534

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Download CSV New Search