Central Research Services Facility and George Palade Laboratory Expansion
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2011021053
Lead Agency
University of California San Diego
Document Title
Central Research Services Facility and George Palade Laboratory Expansion
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/29/2011
Present Land Use
The project sites are located on UCSD property and are designated Academic Use per UCSD's Long Range Development Plan.
Document Description
NOTE: Reference SCH# 2011024004 for the Environmental Assessment.
The project consists of two components on separate project sites on the UCSD West Campus in the School of Medicine (SOM) neighborhood. The project consists of construction of a new three-story, 40,000 GSF Central Research Services Facility (CRSF) to be built on an existing parking lot and an expansion of the existing George Palade Laboratories (GPL) building. The CRSF component would integrate and consolidate existing research support space, equipment, and other associated biomedical research support services into one building. The GPL component would entail development of additional research support space through an interior basement renovation and 1,800 GSF building addition.
Contact Information
Name
Alison Buckley
Agency Name
University of California San Diego
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
La Jolla
Counties
San Diego
Cross Streets
La Jolla Village Drive and Gilman Drive
Zip
92093
Total Acres
.8
State Highways
I-5, I-805
Railways
NCTD Coaster, Amtrak
Schools
La Jolla County Day
Waterways
Rose Creek
Township
15S
Range
4W
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
UC
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.