Beale Air Force Base Land Use Compatibility Plan

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2011012017
Lead Agency
Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Document Title
Beale Air Force Base Land Use Compatibility Plan
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
Per the requirements of the California State Aeronautics Act (PUC Section 21670), the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG), acting in its capacity as the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba counties, has prepared the Beale Air Force Base Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). The ALUCP provides a set of policies for use by the ALUC in evaluating the compatibility between future proposals for land use development in the vicinity of Beale AFB and the potential long-range aircraft activity at the Base. The compatibility criteria defined by the policies are also intended to be reflected in the plans and other policy instruments adopted by Yuba and Sutter counties as the two government entities having jurisdiction over land uses near the Base. Preparation of the ALUCP was guided by the California Department of Transportation, Division of Aeronautics' California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook (2002), as required by PUC 21675(a).

Contact Information
Greg Chew
Sacramento Area Council of Governments
1415 L Street, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814

916 340-6227

Location

Coordinates
39°08'09"N 121°26'11"W
Cities
Marysville
Counties
Yuba
Cross Streets
Hammonton Smartville Rd and Doolittle Dr
Zip
95903
State Highways
Hwy 20
Schools
Far West ES
Waterways
Yuba River

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
N/A

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search