Calero County Park Pond and Wetland Restoration Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2016-0140-R3)

6 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2010122059
Lead Agency
Santa Clara County
Document Title
Calero County Park Pond and Wetland Restoration Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2016-0140-R3)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The wetland mitigation site will restore 0.10 acres of existing wetlands and create 0.02 acres fo wetlands. Work activities include dewatering and then excavation of up to 2 feet of soil, adding a 3-inch thick layer of bentonite and then a 6-12 inch thick layer of soil, anew water control structure, and cattle exclusion fencing. The pond mitigation site will restore approx. 0.5 acres of existing wetlands and create 0.01 acres of wetland habitat. Work activities include excavation of 1,500 sq. ft., bentonite will be laid 3 inches thick and then covered with 6-12 inches of soil, replacement of a water control structure and energy dissipaters, excavation of a 2 foot wide ditch and installation of energy dissipaters, and cattle exclusion fencing. CDFW has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2016-0140-R3, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, enter Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency, as represented by Edmund Sullivan.

Contact Information
Kristin Garrison
CDFW
7329 Silverado Trail
Napa, CA 94558

707-944-5534

Location

Cities
San Jose Morgan Hill Gilroy
Counties
Santa Clara
Regions
County-wide
Cross Streets
nearly county-wide in scope (519,506 acres)
Zip
many
Total Acres
519,506
Parcel #
many
State Highways
many
Railways
several
Airports
several
Schools
many
Waterways
many

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
7329 Silverado Trail, Napa, CA 94558

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Download CSV New Search