ER10-0003

9 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2010102024
Lead Agency
City of Oakland
Document Title
ER10-0003
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/9/2012
Present Land Use
Central Business District/Business Mix/Neighborhood Center Mixed Use/Community Commercial/Urban Residential/Urban Open Space/Institutional/Estuary Policy Plan Land Use.
Document Description
The Proposed Amendments consists of two amendments to the Redevelopment Plan, the 17th Amendment and the 18th Amendment to the Plan. The proposed 17th Amendment would amend the Plan in three ways. First, it would extend the duration of the Redevelopment Plan from 2012 to 2022 and extend the time period that the Redevelopment Agency can receive tax increment funds from 2022 to 2032, as allowed by Senate Bill 211 (codified at Health and Safety Code Section 33333.10 et. Seq.). Second, it would increase the cap on the receipt of tax increment revenue to account for the proposed time extension, as the Redevelopment Agency is anticipated to exceed its existing cap if the time extension is adopted.

Contact Information

Name
Elois Thornton
Agency Name
City of Oakland, Stragetic Planning Division
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Oakland
Counties
Alameda
Cross Streets
bounded by I-980/Lake Merritt/27th Street/Embarcadero
Zip
94612
Total Acres
828
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
I-980, I-880, I-580, I-80
Railways
Various
Airports
No
Schools
Lincoln ES, Laney Coll.
Waterways
Oakland Estuary, Sausal Creek

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
City of Oakland
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
N/A
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
N/A
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print