Richmond Parkway Transit Center
2 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2010102011
- Lead Agency
- Alameda Contra Costa Transit District
- Document Title
- Richmond Parkway Transit Center
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Document Description
- AC Transit proposes to make physical and operational improvements to the existing Richmond Parkway Transit Center at the Interstate 80 (I-80)/Richmond Parkway Interchange. The proposed project includes the construction of a four-level parking garage on the northeastern portion of the existing park and ride lot. The project also includes an expansion of the bus transfer center to accommodate up to 12 buses at any one time. Additional facilities that are planned for the project site would include up to 12 bus shelters, security facilities, restrooms, bicycle parking, and service/maintenance areas.
- Contact Information
-
Jon Twichell
Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District
1600 Franklin Street
Oakland, CA 94612
(530) 577-8889
Location
- Coordinates
- 37°59'10"N 122°18'59"W
- Cities
- Richmond
- Counties
- Contra Costa
- Cross Streets
- Richmond Parkway, I-80, Blume Drive
- Total Acres
- ~ 4
- Parcel #
- 405-290-059, 066, 067, 064, 065, 021
- State Highways
- I-80
- Railways
- AT&SF RR, SPRR
- Schools
- Various
- Waterways
- Garrity Creek, San Pablo Creek, Pinole Creek
- Township
- 2N
- Range
- 4W
- Section
- 28
- Base
- MDB&M
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- AC Transit
- Approving Agency Role
- Lead Agency
- Approved On
- Final EIR Available Location
- AC Transit District Secretary's Office 1600 Franklin Avenue Oakland, CA 94612
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes