California American Wholesale Water Agreement Project (Z14004200)

SCH Number: 2010102003
Lead Agency: Sacramento, City of (City of Sacramento)
Document Title: California American Wholesale Water Agreement Project (Z14004200)
Document Type: NOD - Notice of Determination
Received: 12/29/2010

Document Description: Note: Review per lead The California American Wholesale Water Agreement project would implement proposed revisions to the Wholesale Water Service Agreement between the City and California American Water Company (CAW). The City of Sacramento (City), Department of Utilities (DOU), proposes to construct a new groundwater production well, construct new metering pipeline facilities, and increase delivery volumes to CAW. The project includes installation of a new groundwater well at the northwest corner of Bell Avenue and Rio Linda Road (APN 237-0070-013) and construction of pipelines and appurtenant facilities that would be located in public rights-of-way. The City would install a metering vault at an existing 12-inch turnout off Ethan Way near Alta Arden to be used for a future connection to be constructed by CAW. The turnout is located just east of the Cal Expo grounds and City limits.

Contact Information: Scott Johnson
City of Sacramento
Community Development Dept. Planning Division 300 Richards Boulevard, 3rd Floor
Sacramento, CA 95811
(916) 808-5842

Cities: Sacramento
Counties: Sacramento
Cross Streets: Bell and Rio Linda, Ethan Way and Alta Arden; and Folsom Blvd and Florin Perkins Road
Total Acres: ~2.4
Parcel #: 237-0070-013
State Highways: I-80, Bus 80, US 50
Railways: UPRR RT, Light Rail
Waterways: American River
Other Information: Total Acres: All 3 locations are ~ 2.4 acres

Approving Agency: City of Sacramento, City Council
Approving Agency Role: Lead Agency
Approved On: 12/14/2010
Final EIR Available Location: City of Sacramento Development Services Department, Planning Division 300 Richards Boulevard, 3rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment: Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project: Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project: No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes