Pipelines 3 and 4 Relining: State Route 52 to Lake Murray and Pipeline 3 30-inch Interconnect to Lake Murray Control Valve
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2010091003
Lead Agency
San Diego County Water Authority
Document Title
Pipelines 3 and 4 Relining: State Route 52 to Lake Murray and Pipeline 3 30-inch Interconnect to Lake Murray Control Valve
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/1/2011
Present Land Use
Various
Document Description
The proposed project consists of the installation of half-inch thick, 69-inch diameter collapsed welded steel liners in approximately 19,200 linear feet of existing 72-inch-diameter pre-stressed concrete cylinder pipe. While underground activities would occur along the entire reach of the pipeline, above-ground disturbance activities would occur at specified portal locations and staging areas. Pipeline 4 would be accessed at 11 proposed portals extending over approximately 16,600 linear feet. Access to and relining of Pipeline 3 would occur over approximately 2,600 linear feet, through two more portal locations. In addition to the planned portals, access to the pipelines also would take place through up to 18 existing manhole structures and two temporary access shafts along the length of the project alignment.
Contact Information
Name
Mark V. Tegio
Agency Name
San Diego County Water Authority
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
San Diego
Counties
San Diego
Cross Streets
SR-52, Mission Gorge Road, Jackson Drive, Navajo Road, Lake Shore Drive, Baltimore Drive
Zip
various
Total Acres
13.13
Parcel #
various
State Highways
SR-52, I-8
Railways
No
Airports
MCAS Miramar
Schools
Green, Dallard & Benchley Weinberger Elem.
Waterways
San Diego River
Township
15,16s
Range
2W
Section
unsec
Base
SBB&M
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
San Diego County Water Authority
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.