RSA#1 U.S. Cellular - 62' Tall Monopine Cellular tower
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2010082071
Lead Agency
Humboldt County
Document Title
RSA#1 U.S. Cellular - 62' Tall Monopine Cellular tower
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/29/2010
Present Land Use
Single-family residential development w/ accessory structures/ Residential Low Density/ Single-family Residential.
Document Description
Conditional Use Permit for the development of a 62' tall cellular communications facility in the R-1 zone. A Special Permit is also requested to allow the proposed tower to exceed the 35' height limit. The "mono-pine"-style pole, proposed equipment shelter (approximately 180 sf in size), and concrete pads for a future diesel back-up generator and propane tank, will be located along the south-western boundary of the approximately 2-acre parcel. The proposed pole will utilize a "stealth" design that is manufactured to look like a conifer tree. The tower is designed to allow room for co-location by another carrier. All antennas will be hidden within the "branches" of the "monopine". The applicant has submitted evidence indicating that the antennas currently proposed will not exceed the FCC's standards for public exposure.
Contact Information
Name
Steve Lazar
Agency Name
Humboldt County Community Development Services
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Eureka
Counties
Humboldt
Cross Streets
Beechwood Drive and Ridgewood Drive
Zip
95501
Total Acres
2
Parcel #
303-022-38
State Highways
Hwy 101
Railways
Northwestern Pacific
Airports
Murray Field
Schools
Ridgewood ES
Waterways
Ryan Creek
Township
4N
Range
1W
Section
14
Base
HBM
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
County of Humboldt
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.