Golden Hills Energy Facility Repowering Project [California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2014-034-R3 Amendment 1 (Amendment)]

17 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2010082063
Lead Agency
Alameda County
Document Title
Golden Hills Energy Facility Repowering Project [California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2014-034-R3 Amendment 1 (Amendment)]
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
Project authorized under the original ITP was expected to result in the following impact acreages to CA threatened species San Joaquin kit fox (vulpes macrotis mutica) and CA threatened species CA tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense) habitat: 50.9 acres of permanent habitat loss (49.9 acres of upland habitat and 1.01 acres of aquatic habitat) and 204.5 acres of temporary upland habitat loss. Based on the results of site restoration and stock pond hydrological analysis, the Project resulted in 50.8 acres of permanently facility impacts (upland only) and 354.4 acres of temporary facility impacts. This Amendment increases the amount of compensatory habitat that is necessary and required pursuant to CESA to fully mitigate unauthorized project related impacts of the taking on the Covered Species resulting from the Project.

Contact Information
Marcia Gresrud
CDFW
7329 Silverado trail
Napa, CA 94558

707-644-2812

Location

Cities
Livermore Tracy
Counties
Alameda
Regions
Unincorporated
Cross Streets
North and south of I-580 just west of the Alameda/Contra Costa County border
Total Acres
43.358
State Highways
I-580
Airports
Byron
Schools
Mountain House ES; San Joaquin Delta College

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
7329 Silverado Trail, Napa, CA 94558

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Download CSV New Search