Alameda Creek Bridge Replacement Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600- 2018-0345-R3)

SCH Number: 2010082001
Lead Agency: Caltrans 4 (Oakland) (California Department of Transportation, District 4)
Document Title: Alameda Creek Bridge Replacement Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600- 2018-0345-R3)
Document Type: NOD - Notice of Determination
Received: 7/2/2019

Document Description: The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2017-0503-R3, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, California Department of Transportation, District 4. The California Department of Transportation (Permittee) proposes to replace the Alameda Creek Bridge (Bridge No. 33-0036) to meet current design standards for safety. The Project proposes replace the existing 1928 bridge with a new, two-lane structure with standard eight-foot-wide shoulders, approximately 75 feet north of the existing bridge. The Project will include a temporary access road , water diversion, CIDH pile installation area, removal of an existing concrete weir, build road to match new alignment, construct soil nail wall, construct a new viaduct structure and restore the impacted areas on-site. The Project shall take place over three construction seasons.

Contact Information: Robert Stanley
Department of Fish and Wildlife Bay-Delta Region 3
2825 Cordelia Road, Suite 100
Fairfield, CA 94534
(707) 428-2093

Counties: Alameda
Other Location Info: The Alameda Creek Bridge (Bridge No. 33-0036) Project (Project) is located within Niles Canyon over Alameda Creek along Sta~e Route 84 (SR-84) at Post Mile 13.0 to 13.6, in Alameda County, in the State of California.

Approving Agency: CDFW
Approving Agency Role: Responsible Agency
Approved On: 6/26/2019
Final EIR Available Location: California Department of Transportation, D4 111 Grand Avenue Oakland, CA 94612

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment: Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project: Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project: Yes
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes