SR 166 Gifford Curve Correction Project - Agreement 2012-0015-R4
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2010081091
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 5
Document Title
SR 166 Gifford Curve Correction Project - Agreement 2012-0015-R4
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/18/2012
Present Land Use
San Luis Obispo - Agriculture
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Game is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code, to the Project applicant. Caltrans proposes to remove Bridge 49-0142 over Gifford Creek and replace it with a new bridge on the new road alignment. The new bridge will be 43 feet 10 inches wide with an 84 foot long span over Gifford Creek. No piers would be required in the creek bed. Rock Slope Protection would be added near the abutments to prevent erosion. No water diversion or dewatering is expected. The bridge will be built using a spread footing, rather than pile-driving. The existing bridge would be removed after construction is completed. Construction equipment will need to enter the jurisdictional drainages. However, no construction equipment is allowed to work in flowing water. The Project will permanently impact 0.15 acres and temporarily impact 0.36 acres of riparian habitat. The Project will not require the removal of any riparian trees.
Contact Information
Name
Laura Peterson-Diaz
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
San Luis Obispo
Cross Streets
Gifford Rancho Road
Parcel #
State right-of-way
State Highways
SR 166
Waterways
Cuyama River
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Santa Maria
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.