Engineering Geotechnical Studies for the Bay Delta Conservation and/or Preliminary Engineering Studies for the Delta Habitat Conservation and Conveyance Program
11 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2010062041
Lead Agency
California Department of Water Resources
(DWR)
Document Title
Engineering Geotechnical Studies for the Bay Delta Conservation and/or Preliminary Engineering Studies for the Delta Habitat Conservation and Conveyance Program
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/30/2012
Present Land Use
Various
Document Description
The DWR is planning to conduct overwater and land geotech. Borings, perform cone penetration tests (CPT) and dig approx. 30 small test pits in order to test soils in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. DWR will investigate engineering properties of soils within a narrow corridor transecting the Delta. Purpose of investigation is to gather necessary geotech, information to support the prep. Of a draft EIR/EIS for proposed BDCP and/or DHCCP. The CWC adopted resolutions of necessity March 21 to provide access for the Project (Attachment A-2).
Contact Information
Name
Rachel Ballanti
Agency Name
California Water Commission
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Isleton
Counties
Contra Costa, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Solano, Yolo
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
Hwy 4, 5, 12, 160, 220
Waterways
Various
Section
Multi
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Water Commission
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.