Bridgeport Public Utility District Arsenic Removal Project
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2010061025
Lead Agency
Bridgeport Public Utilities District
Document Title
Bridgeport Public Utility District Arsenic Removal Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/15/2016
Present Land Use
Public facilities land use district
Document Description
Construct a new 1,400 sf water treatment building to house an arsenic removal system that would treat flows from two potable water supply wells. The proposed project also includes new underground raw and treated water, sewer, power, propane, and communication lines, as well as a paved driveway, parking, fencing, landscaping improvements, as well as 200 lineal feet of new and replacement 8" water line, several water valves, and a sewer lateral within the Twin Lakes Road right-of-way. The purpose of the proposed project is to comply with the federal and state drinking water standard and begin removing naturally occurring arsenic from the potable water supply.
Contact Information
Name
Renn Nolan
Agency Name
Bridgeport Public Utilities District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Counties
Mono
Cross Streets
Twin Lakes Road/US Highway 395
Zip
93517
Total Acres
0.18
Parcel #
8-131-14, 8-131-08
State Highways
Hwy 395
Airports
Bryant Field
Schools
Bridgeport Elem.
Township
5N
Range
25E
Section
32
Base
MDB&M
Other Location Info
City: Bridgeport
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Bridgeport Public Utility District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.