Sump 154 Low-Flow Outfall Replacement Project

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2010052037
Lead Agency
Sacramento, City of (City of Sacramento)
Document Title
Sump 154 Low-Flow Outfall Replacement Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The Sump of 154 Low-Flow Outlet Replacement Project consists of excavating to a depth of 3 ft to remove the existing buried 135 ft long 12 inch diameter low-flow outlet pipe and replace it with a new 12 inch diameter, high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe on the same general alignment. All HDPE joints would be fusion welded to provide a monolithic, non-corrodible pipe. A new flapgate would be installed on the discharge end of the low-flow outlet pipe. The Project also includes installation of a 6 inch diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) side drain to connect the large flip bucket with the low-flow outlet strucure. The purpose of the side drain is to facilitate circulation of standing water in the large flip bucket, and thus reduce mosquito breeding. The 6 inch side drain would be installed between the western wall of the conscrete flip bucket discharge structure and the headwall of the low-flow discharge structure. No work will occur within the existing Rock Slope Protection (RSP) adjacent to the discharge structures, and now new RSP will be added.

Contact Information
Scott Johnson
City of Sacramento
300 Richards Boulevard
Sacramento, CA 95811

916-808-5842

Location

Cities
Sacramento
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
Eleanor and Norwood
Total Acres
<0.1
Parcel #
263-0010-036, 037
Railways
UPRR
Waterways
Steelhead Creek, Arcade Creek

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
City of Sacramento, Department of Utilities
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
City of Sacramento, Development Services Department, Planning Division 300 Richards Blvd., Third Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search